The Problem: Centralized Security’s Breaking Point

The last decade has exposed the fragility of traditional cybersecurity architectures. Despite record investments, organizations remain vulnerable due to:

• Siloed intelligence: Detection tools often operate in isolation, lacking context across cloud, endpoint, and network layers.

• Reactive defense: Most systems respond after compromise, instead of predicting or validating anomalies in real time.

• Opaque processes: Enterprises trust vendor algorithms without visibility into how risk scores or detections are derived.

• Data centralization risks: Logs and telemetry collected in one place form a high-value target for attackers and insider threats.

• Regulatory pressure: Compliance frameworks now demand provable, immutable evidence of security operations—something traditional systems can’t provide.

The result: security teams are overwhelmed with false positives, compliance departments struggle with unverifiable data, and the overall model of centralized trust is eroding.